> I don't know how many times this has been proposed > here is one > https[https://framaforms.org]://[https://framaforms.org]framaforms.org[https://framaforms.org]
I see the problem. 1. I've heard > https[https://framaforms.org]://[https://framaforms.org]framaforms.org[https://framaforms.org] my first time. It is even not correctly fully translated to English. The first barrier :) 2. Proposing is not enough (at least where I come from). The proposer or one of their like minded needs to go into the lead to make others apply the new tool to their workflow. As I said earlier: People use what they know and feel comfortable with. You need to make sure that people get comfortable with the new tool if you cannot force them to use it. 3. Optional: The OSMF not providing guidance how to make surveys, on which platform etc. > a company whose economic activity is to build a profile > to sell it via advertising not a privacy concern ? :-O You fill out this form without Google account required, you clear your browser cache after closing your browser, you use good browsers like Firefox, your ip address changes frequently if you're lucky living in Europe/Canada. These actually understand privacy (and at least Europeans turn it into an ideology or ignore it completely. Only the extreme sides exist here mostly). Apr 28, 2023 17:27:58 Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com>: > Le 28.04.23 à 16:47, Sören Reinecke a écrit : >> rather to provide useful suggestion / realistic alternatives > > I don't know how many times this has been proposed > here is one https://framaforms.org > >> So please stop complaining > > Wasn't the aim to collect opinions on the communication ? > >> wanting to use OSS only is a ideology > > i'm not talking about OSS but about a privacy-friendly hoster: > if the study is based on a closed software hosted by the team doing > the survey, it would be a shame but you would not have heard any criticism > from me. > if the study is based on open software hosted by a profiling company, > I would have had the same issue as i have with Google form > > PS : osm is also an ideology :) > >> In this case privacy is not even a concern. > > a company whose economic activity is to build a profile > to sell it via advertising not a privacy concern ? :-O > > Regards, > Marc > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
