I think this is a great idea. Cheers, Michael
> On Nov 16, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey Working Group, > > Before we meet on Tuesday I wanted to put an idea on the table that I think > will shape our wg discussion. What do you think of setting a goal of WGLC for > our three in-progress docs before the March IETF? This would require > increasing wg activity, for example, having monthly calls to consider and > resolve open issues. I think we’re reaching a point where wg engagement is > starting to drop and I’m concerned if we delay closing out the docs there > will be few people engaged to do a serious review of the results. A lot of > work has gone into TAPS and I think we should aspire to finish strong. > Comments? I’m especially interested to hear what the doc editors think. > > --aaron > > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
_______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
