---- Original Message ----- From: "Aaron Falk" <[email protected]> To: "taps WG" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2019 7:11 AM Subject: [Taps] finishing things
> Hey Working Group, > > Before we meet on Tuesday I wanted to put an idea on the table that I > think will shape our wg discussion. What do you think of setting a goal > of WGLC for our three in-progress docs before the March IETF? This > would require increasing wg activity, for example, having monthly calls > to consider and resolve open issues. I think we’re reaching a point > where wg engagement is starting to drop and I’m concerned if we delay > closing out the docs there will be few people engaged to do a serious > review of the results. A lot of work has gone into TAPS and I think we > should aspire to finish strong. Comments? I’m especially interested > to hear what the doc editors think. Aaron I am not sure which three you have in mind but suspect that it does not include draft-jholland-taps-api-yang Tom Petch > --aaron ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > _______________________________________________ Taps mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
