On 17 Nov 2019, at 22:48, tom petch wrote:

I am not sure which three you have in mind but suspect that it does not
include
draft-jholland-taps-api-yang

Tom Petch

Thanks for bringing this up, Tom. Note that TAPS hasn’t adopted this draft as a working group item. We have some options. It could be absorbed into one of the TAPS docs if a) folks thought it was in-scope and sufficiently useful and b) it was mature enough. If not, we could consider adopting it in TAPS as a new work item. I’d prefer that it did not slow down completion of the 3 wg drafts. Thoughts?

--aaron
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to