but many issues already have people assigned in github....   just a matter of 
making sure all are assigned to someone?  that should be easy


Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Nov 2019, at 10:39, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Excellent point. Suppose at a minimum we assign an owner to each issue to 
> propose and socialize a resolution? If it’s already known or obvious, can the 
> folks preparing for Tuesday’s meeting put names of nominal owners by issues?
> 
> On 16 Nov 2019, at 22:37, Brian Trammell (IETF) wrote:
> 
> +1; we should allocate time on our agenda here to actually set the schedule 
> for these interims, to avoid the ”let’s think about that later” problem.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 16 Nov 2019, at 15:13, Michael Welzl <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I think this is a great idea.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Michael
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 16, 2019, at 3:11 PM, Aaron Falk <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey Working Group,
>>> 
>>> Before we meet on Tuesday I wanted to put an idea on the table that I think 
>>> will shape our wg discussion. What do you think of setting a goal of WGLC 
>>> for our three in-progress docs before the March IETF? This would require 
>>> increasing wg activity, for example, having monthly calls to consider and 
>>> resolve open issues. I think we’re reaching a point where wg engagement is 
>>> starting to drop and I’m concerned if we delay closing out the docs there 
>>> will be few people engaged to do a serious review of the results. A lot of 
>>> work has gone into TAPS and I think we should aspire to finish strong. 
>>> Comments? I’m especially interested to hear what the doc editors think.
>>> 
>>> --aaron
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taps mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taps mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
> 
_______________________________________________
Taps mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

Reply via email to