Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: I was writing my own reply but will just add to Stian's.
> Scufl2 is meant to describe tavernalike datadriven worldliest, For "worldliest" read "workflows". > so if the > hive workflow structure is significantly similar it might be doable, yes. I just had a brief look at Ensembl Hive and there are a lot of (probably inevitable) analogies with what Taverna has e.g. Process v Processor/Activity, Dataflow v Datalink, AnalysisCtrlRule v Condition. [snip] > There are bound to be differences, like how lists are iterated over or how > service implementations are defined. Part of our scufl2 plan was to allow > several alternative bindings of activities. This is necessary anyway for running workflows on a server. If there is some type of user-interaction, then it cannot be done the same way as when running the workflow within the workbench. > Other differences could be dealt with by some kind of baseline, like a > common set of possible workflows, and other more specialised baselines that > are not crossengine compatible. Indeed. > Buy yeah, sounds exciting! I agree. > We're also thinking along similar lines working with Meandre. Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _______________________________________________ taverna-hackers mailing list [email protected] Web site: http://www.taverna.org.uk Mailing lists: http://www.taverna.org.uk/taverna-mailing-lists/ Developers Guide: http://www.mygrid.org.uk/tools/developer-information
