Hello Marek, On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 01:27:54 +0100 GMT (28/Mar/10, 7:27 AM +0700 GMT), Marek Mikus wrote:
MM>>> I am sure, check who resolved it ;-) >> >> I checked, but this is the first time I hear Mr. Tsurcanovsky's name. MM> if You want to know, Igor wrote new spellchecking system in v4.0 for MM> example. I am sure he is an expert. >> You seem to be confident that his name guarantees that it's really >> fixed. MM> I have resolved bugtrack entry, because I checked it myself. Good for you. MM>>> I have confirmed bugfix and resolved ticket, build I had for testing works MM>>> like it should, image from HTTPS paths are correctly downloaded and there MM>>> are no idle tasks in CC. >> OK, good to hear it works on your computer. The idea of having a group >> of beta testers is... never mind, I'm looking forward to testing it >> with the next beta. MM> do You really think, Ritlabs will *not* release build to betatesters, if it MM> is ready for release? Just do not read too much conspiration theories. No conspiracy theory. It's just that we, over here on the beta list, want something to play with. >> Why not just copy the new code for the ConCenter into beta 4.2.33.7 >> and release it as beta .33.8? Never mind the IMAP fixes, which are >> still being worked on. MM> You are still do not understand it - there are "no" IMAP fixes, there is MM> completely new code for IMAP and big part of existing code must be MM> rewritten to support new IMAP code, this is major task and there is MM> not possible to release working build with this bugfix and old code, MM> because merging already started. >From a marketing point-of-view, i.e. keeping the beta testers happy, if would be good to release a beta with this fix before completing the major task. All of the above is just my opinion. Others might see that differently and prefer to wait a long time and then have a hundred new things to test at the same time, and discover that another hundred old things don't work any more. I myself prefer smaller steps, more beta versions with small fixes. We don't need guarantees that it has been fixed, we need to test it. Point in case: Even though it has been fixed on your computer, it hasn't been fixed on mine! The question posted in the subject line still stands: When are we going to get the fix? I won't download the first beta with the IMAP changes, I'll leave that to the people who use IMAP and will deal with the new bugs. I do need this new beta bug to be fixed though. Any chance? -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.33.7 Beta under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.2.35 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
