On Monday, December 15, 2003 @ 10:55:41 AM [-0700], Dierk Haasis wrote: > This is simply wrong, betas *are* supposed to work. If they were not, > what to test?
I should have said that betas don't usually work as advertised. > And the original message you cited, and further messages by various ML > members, were just pointing out what is a shame lately: We beta test, > we find bugs - and they stay even through more than one release > version. Instead of fixing known bugs RITLabs seems to be more > interested in adding new features with not just possible but real new > bugs. That's simply not good policy, neither technically nor from a > marketing PoV as Maxxx and Allie pointed out. This is true. I just think that some of the discussions get way to accusatory toward Stefan. Maybe he gets paid handsomely to be the programmer-that-has-to-do-the-beta-announcements-and-gets-attacked...I don't know. You catch more flies with honey than vinegar as they say... -- Matt ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 2.03.6 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
