Hi TBBETA, On 22 February 2005, at 23:37:31 +0100 (which was 22:37 where I live) Peter Fjelsten wrote
>>> IMHO, this level of Alpha version should never go public, not even to >>> this list. >> I don't agree here. It was advertised as an Alpha release. > OK as per BS standards (yes, I have recently been ISEB certified > software tester), alpha tests/releases per definition take place > in-house. I have been using BS standards for at least 7 years. :) >>> Only after a program has been thoroughly tested by the developers and >>> a very selective group of volunteers and the program has shown to be >>> stable (not saying bug free!!), it should be made available to a >>> wider audience, i.e. this TBBETA list. DE>> I am sorry but it was released a alpha release. Yea and ?? > That being said, I don't mind Ritlabs releasing an Alpha to the general > public (although it as per BS standards would be a Beta :-) ) as long as > it is clearly marked as such. But they follow the correct protocols. They announced it as an an alpha. > People (including myself) have anxiously been waiting for news from > Ritlabs and I suppose that they have released this version to give people > something to "work with". < ... > Then wait for a beta. :) -- BBFN, _______________________________________________ David | David Elliott | Software Engineer | _________________________| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP Key ID 0x650F4534 | | Oxymoron: Uprooted plant | | Using The Bat ! 3.0.2.4 Rush pro | | but crippled by Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 |
pgpwPApsjhhKA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________________ Current beta is 3.0.9.1 Deep Alpha | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
