Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 8:15:59 AM, you wrote:
> Hello 9Val,
> A reminder of what 9Val on TBBETA typed on:
> 29 April 2005 at 22:48:33 GMT +0200
9>> On the way, it was not enough stable to be included. Don't see any
9>> sence to get a lot of AVs reports which are known for us
> But you still release an RC version that is still crawling alive with bugs
> that are also known to you?
> Forgive my ignorance but shouldn't a release candidate be devoid of
> virtually all known bugs before you release it?
> As much as I love TB I just can't understand the reasoning or rational of
> RITLABS in sending out new versions that are still full of known bugs,
> especially one that they consider ready for public release.
> I personally don't think this series is anywhere remotely close to being
> releasable, the list of known bugs is still a long as a Donky's Doo Dah.
In total agreement Tony. I am in the race engineering business, a
company has "rushed" into releasing an expensive new race car over here
with a new engine and transmission. They are suffering immediate
problems with engine and transmission and their credibility has suffered
serious harm, IMO. I really don't think 3.5 is anywhere near what a
paying end user should be expected to have as release version yet.
--
Best regards,
Chris Wilson
The Bat 3.5 Return RC1 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build
Number 2195 Service Pack 4
________________________________________________________
Current beta is 3.5 Return RC/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
