Hello Graham,

Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 11:18:41 AM, you wrote:

FG> HamMails:      18191
FG> SpamMails:     4063
FG> detected Ham:  2087 (99.86%)
FG> detected Spam: 94 (93.62%)
FG> FALSE Ham detected:  6
FG> FALSE Spam detected: 3

FG> .. I think this is pretty good. Can other systems do better?

K9 report:

Since ma apr 26 2004  02:32:21 (408 days)
Server Check

Total number of emails processed                             110,697
                                                             271/day
Number of Good emails processed                              104,084
                                                              94.03%
Number of Spam emails processed                                6,613
                                                               5.97%
Percentage of emails that matched whitelist rules              0.00%
Percentage of emails that matched blacklist rules              0.38%
Number of emails re-classified to Good                             7
Number of emails re-classified to Spam                           664
Percent misidentified as Spam (false positives)                0.01%
Percent misidentified as Good (false negatives)                0.60%
Accuracy                                                      99.39%

Personal notes:

The 7 emails had to be re-classified to Good because I personally had
(by clicking the wrong button) re-classiefied them to Spam before.

� 90% of the 664 re-classified to Spam had been caught by TB! filters
Most of those are caught by the rule that looks for text cotaining no
full stop (".", that is) while the sender is not in the address book.

Another type of messages that K9 had problems with are those that contain
"normal" text that doesn't have anything to do with the attached gif that
tries to sell _i_g_a, c_a_i_ and ch_a_ software (I'm not witing it in full:
one might never know if this message gets caught by an anti-spam filter :-) )
Most of those get caught by making a filter look for =?utf-8?B? or =?utf-8?q?
while the address of the sender isn't in the addressbook.


-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
                           
using The Bat! Version 3.5.25 with
MyMacros 1.11
Useless Macro Collection 2.1.1121 rc8
zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Windows 2000 Professional/5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 (0 days 2:38:44) on
Uno AMD Duron




________________________________________________________
 Current beta is 3.5.26 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/

Reply via email to