Guten Tag danger, am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 um 02:59 schrieben Sie:
> I think that the following has to be taken into consideration. > 1) The Bat can not stop working with out clear warning. > (most users will not read a log) Maybe it could be of interest to work over the Alert-System into 3 categories: Notification(uncritical)/Warning(serious)/Red-Alert(critical) and "design" the according Popups in yellow/orange/red. > 2) If every other MTA will throw up a warning and a > possible bypass The Bat needs to do so as well It's not needed to do so in every case, but if it is possible to continue with Mails, then it should be possible. The Bat (designed as "save" Application) could point here with a very understandable and informable Message, which makes the user understand what is happening now. > 3) If The Bat stops working for this type of error and > another MTA works. It will be conceived as a bug in the > Bat, and so The other MTA will be used and the Bat will be > disregarded and will be considered a poor product. That's what i already tried to say. > 4) Their will be cases where a user or user can not easily > get to another MTA or understand the problem and will be > irritated by the program, to them simply not working IE: > on a ship See above: explain it as best, what is the problem. I can not understand the "on a ship" part? > 5) Sysops take vacations as well. So there for the user > can not get mail? Unacceptable. Most Cases the Users are not able to punish their sysops to fix it, or you see the vacations explanation for example. But they really need to go on, if it is possible. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.14.5 Windows 2000 5.0 build 2195 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.14.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
