Hello danger, On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:59:24 -0500 GMT (25/02/2008, 08:59 +0700 GMT), danger wrote:
d> I think that the following has to be taken into consideration. d> d> 1) The Bat can not stop working with out clear warning. (most users will not read a log) d> d> 2) If every other MTA will throw up a warning and a possible d> bypass The Bat needs to do so as well d> d> 3) If The Bat stops working for this type of error and another MTA d> works. It will be conceived as a bug in the Bat, and so The other d> MTA will be used and the Bat will be disregarded and will be considered a poor product. d> d> 4) Their will be cases where a user or user can not easily get to d> another MTA or understand the problem and will be irritated by the d> program, to them simply not working IE: on a ship d> d> 5) Sysops take vacations as well. So there for the user can not get mail? Unacceptable. d> Who gets to file the BUG report? Your suggestions are good. I think you should get the honour. But I believe The Bat! is an MUA (mail user agent), not an MTA (mail transfer agent - server). -- Cheers, Thomas. Fluchtweg Betreten Verboten! * http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.0.14.5 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.14.7 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
