Hello Volker, Sunday, February 24, 2008, 5:38:22 PM, you wrote:
VA> [Reply to: »Jens Franik« · 2008-02-24 · 23:28 h (CET)] VA> Hello, Jens! >>> Are you trying to save the internet by disallowing this in TB!? >> I thought this right the moment now. I would support a urgly and red >> Error-Message with a Confirmation Dialog to User, becaue it is >> security relevant, but i would want it to allow this for some >> days/weeks/months/forever (with a second confirmation). <SNIP> VA> Seriously, that would be a good option. VA> Cheers! VA> VA I think that the following has to be taken into consideration. 1) The Bat can not stop working with out clear warning. (most users will not read a log) 2) If every other MTA will throw up a warning and a possible bypass The Bat needs to do so as well 3) If The Bat stops working for this type of error and another MTA works. It will be conceived as a bug in the Bat, and so The other MTA will be used and the Bat will be disregarded and will be considered a poor product. 4) Their will be cases where a user or user can not easily get to another MTA or understand the problem and will be irritated by the program, to them simply not working IE: on a ship 5) Sysops take vacations as well. So there for the user can not get mail? Unacceptable. Who gets to file the BUG report? -- Best regards, danger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________ Current beta is 4.0.14.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
