-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Andrew!

On Saturday, March 24, 2001 at 9:23:17 PM you wrote:


> What is the difference between these two versions of PGP? Should I
> install 7.0.3 in spite of the fact that TB doesn't work with this
> latest version (and I'll have to copy the whole message into
> clipboard, sign, then paste it back) or is it quite Ok to have 6.5.8?

1. The dreary sounding part in your question can be handled nearly
automatically by "Use Current Window" in PGPTray.

2. 6.5.8 is safe and easy to use (as long as it is a scrutinised
version like the one from CKT).

3. At leaving NAI Phil Zimmermann gave out a statement saying that he
finds the 7.0.3 the best version of PGP made yet
(http://web.mit.edu/prz/).

4. The questions are: What is new? Would you use it? Does anything lack
in 6.5.8 what you really need - and is it implemented in 7.0.3?

5. Since I am quite contend with 6.5.8 (CKT) there has to be done a
lot to convince of 7.0.3 (like publishing the entire code, which will
as it seems not be).

6. An old saying in computer technology: Never change a running
system!

- --
Dierk Haasis

PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

The Bat 1.52 Beta/1

Windows 95 4.0 1212 C

Die meisten Leute machen sich selbst bloß durch übertriebene
Forderungen an das Schicksal unzufrieden. (Wilhelm von Humboldt)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
Comment: Privacy:  The core element of freedom!

iQA/AwUBOr20s/To1oA8g8dLEQIBKQCguoexSak8JCFEzj2KHOjo0r8FjnwAnjIV
Tc1pgadhaBSDGh0H3i6j1rWS
=PlDT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
______________________________________________________
Archives   : <http://tbtech.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You are subscribed as : [email protected]


Reply via email to