Hi Nick,
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:55:03 -0800GMT (01/02/2000, 13:55 +0800GMT),
Nick Andriash wrote:
NA> On the other hand... :o) I see a few "high priority" messages that really
NA> are... Ummm... questionable, so we might just end up with red folders all
NA> over the place. Still, I like the idea as long as marking messages as such
NA> wasn't abused.
Many of the messages I receive (office) are marked "high priority"; so
that I chose to ignore the flag. So a red folder would be almost
equivalent to a folder containing unread messages. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.39
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
