Hello Thomas,
On Tuesday, February 01, 2000 you wrote:
NA>> On the other hand... :o) I see a few "high priority" messages that really
NA>> are... Ummm... questionable, so we might just end up with red folders all
NA>> over the place. Still, I like the idea as long as marking messages as such
NA>> wasn't abused.
> Many of the messages I receive (office) are marked "high priority"; so
> that I chose to ignore the flag. So a red folder would be almost
> equivalent to a folder containing unread messages. ;-)
Hey, people, what are we talking about? Outbox? If so, then red outbox
*is* equivalent to any other folder containing unread messages. This
red color of outbox has nothing in common to any high priority
messages!
If you are talking about red INbox, then I would be happy to get
informed how to do this...
Best regards,
--
Christopher J. Trybowski
===========================================================================
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- uin:4350719 ---
---- http://www.trybik.i.krakow.pl --- pgp-keys: 0xB92EEE69 0x9382700B ----
===( get-pgp-keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=send_key )===
Using The Bat! 1.39 [reg] under Windows 98 4.10 build 1998.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
