NZc> <snip> >> I have never been happy with the official support of TB and this looks >> like a good opportunity to make the change.
NZc> I'm sorry, but I do have to comment on this one. NZc> Unless my time stamps are totally off, you received an answer to your NZc> question in less than 2 hours after you posted it. This mailing list NZc> has never failed to answer a question of mine since I started used TB! NZc> over 10 years ago. I think you may have misunderstood me or maybe I don't understand this list. Is this list considered "official support" for TB? When I said "official support," I was referring to contacting TB directly, not posting here. For the last major problem I had with TB I sent an email to them via their website. They did respond but they couldn't fix the problem. The last response I received from them said something like, "If that doesn't fix it, we can't help you. This ticket is now closed." That is simply not an acceptable answer for a program that is paid for. There are other reasons that I am unhappy with TB but it doesn't serve any purpose to list them here. NZc> Thunderbird has it's pluses, but TB! is still the best stand-alone NZc> e-mail client I've ever used. I suppose it depends upon what you mean by "the best." Anyone following the progress of TB can see a clear pattern of new releases coming out, which have to be paid for, before problems in the previous releases have been fixed. I don't hold it against anyone for charging for their work but they should support it too, which the programmers do a poor job of. At least that is the way I see based on personal experience. -- Jack ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.42 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
