Hi Jamie,
On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:19:37 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 18:19 +0800GMT),
Jamie Dainton wrote:
JD> I do not think it is necessary to decrease our security to
JD> accommodate the minority of users who have a very low bandwidth
JD> connection.
Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing
list only for high-bandwidth privileged users? If so, I will
immediately withdraw and not bother the elected few any longer.
I also want to clarify that I have no objections against PGP
signatures, as the increase in bandwidth is minimal. Even though I
find signatures on mailing lists unneccessary, but that is another
discussion.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.45
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
on a Pentium II/350 MHz.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : archive@jab.org
