Hello Gergely Vandor,
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000 04:25:27 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, November 23, 2000, 03:25:27 (GMT+0100) (BST) my local time,
Gergely Vandor wrote:
GV> Both strong and weak encryption can be broken pretty easily for
GV> anyone who knows a little about cryptology
If it could be broken easily it wouldn't be strong encryption. This
fact negates that argument. Good strong encryption could defend your
mailboxes for up to five years. Unbreakable encryption is not possible
as this would require an infinite amount of processing to generate it.
GV> In the event of a keylogger being present PGPdisk and other disk
GV> encryption softwares are just as worthless. (Besides being an extra
GV> burden to install and operate.) But in real life situations weak
GV> encryption is worth just as much as the best.
Well most people would know if a Keylogger was being used. Files being
created that you didn't make with odd data. Extra processes and memory
usage and probable attempted outbound comms which your firewall picks
up.
GV>
GV> Just my opinion. And I suspect I may be totally wrong. :)
Not totally wrong but a bit.
--
Jamie Dainton
On Thursday, November 23, 2000 at 08:31:48
The Bat! 1.48 Beta/8
Windows 98 4.10 2222
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=sendKey
Error: Sector not found -- search behind couch? (Y/N)
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team double click here:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click here and send the message:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
