On Saturday, February 17, 2001, 8:24:59 AM, Chema wrote:
> After a couple of months being a silent member of this list, I
> think Im ready to post. *g*
Welcome!
> I completely agree this, IMO its time to ritlabs stopping
> developing new version (except of critical bugs) and working a bit
> on documentation.
I'm not sure about this. If v2 is still, say, more than a year away,
I would agree with you. If it's a week away, then why bother, since
much of the documentation would have to be modified again. If it's
anywhere in between, then it depends. My point is, whether to stop
developing new version to work on documentation depends heavily on
something that we don't know.
How close is v2 to the finish line, is anyone's guess. Even RIT
folks might not know it for sure. But we as users couldn't possibly
know better than they do.
As someone in *dire* need of some features promised for v2, I for
one would certainly vote for RIT folks to go full speed ahead with
v2, though I understand people who are content with the current
version might think a better documentation is more important.
--
Best regards,
Ming-Li
The Bat! 1.49e | Win2k SP1
--
______________________________________________________
Archives : <http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TBTech List: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You are subscribed as : [email protected]
