-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:12:07 +0700, Han Thomas [HT] wrote these comments: ... HT> Yes... I will.. but PGP has been under development for decades. HT> SecureBat is very promising, but it is new. There will be HT> weaknesses. So even with SecureBat I'd probably still install it HT> on a PGP-Disk.
So you aren't uncomfortable about all your mail residing in a single file which, if corrupted, leads to loss of all your mail. While using SecureBat!, one of my message bases corrupted. I therefore had to restore the errant message base from a backup, loosing all the messages that came in after the backup was done. If the PGPDisk had corrupted and I used the backup, I would have lost all mail that had come in after the time of the last backup. - -- �Allie C Martin -- List Moderator and fellow end-user PGPKey - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1 [MUA: TB! v1.54/10 (*) OS: Win2K SP 2] __ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) Comment: Sealed for Security iEYEARECAAYFAjvf65kACgkQV8nrYCsHF+J1MACg3p9IV4sneZaDJ9arG3B02Bb9 0IwAoOsLxNnrP7q9m+AX4UMxuvr5QxZZ =uBje -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
