Hello Rémi, Historians believe that Wednesday, December 12, 2001 at 22:01 GMT +0200 was when, Rémi Pach [RP] typed the following:
RP> I am also happy overall with TB as it is. Don't get me wrong. Your posts suggest that you are very discontented. Perhaps it is because your posts haven't mentioned any *good* things about TB or it's development. They seem to be biased towards the negative. RP> I don't need anything radically different. Then why the fuss? RP> It's just that after all the hype about v2, and all the promises RP> that were made, it looks like we are going to end up with a 1.54 RP> version pompously called 2.0 but that will have *very* few of the RP> major innovations promised for v2. How did you come to that conclusion? 1. You've stated that you haven't tried the beta series. As Marck said, many things have been completely rewritten. Add up all the changes that have occurred since the interview and the current beta and you'd see that we have seen a *lot* of what was promised. Sure, you can pick your pet example of what has *not* been done yet, but why don't you look at what has been done instead? It helps keep the stress meter down. ;-) 2. I have not heard RITLabs make any comment that 1.54 will be released as V.2. I have also not heard them say that 1.54 is even close to being ready for release. Everything I've heard in that regard is speculation or extrapolation of comments made by RITLabs. 3. Don't forget, a lot of that hype was not generated by RITLabs. Most of it was from "enthusiastic" users. :-) RP> There is a sense of anticlimax. I hate to ruin the party, but, it's only software. -- Thanks for writing, Januk Aggarwal Trigonometry for farmers: swine and cowswine. -- Erland G. -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com