-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 21:30:27 +0200GMT (which was 20:30 +0100GMT where I live),
R�mi Pach thought about "Just curious why ...." and wrote:
>> I couldn't disagree more. You are completely wrong. More than 50% of
>> the goals you have listed above have been met. That doesn't
>> constitute "far off".
RP> It does because the things that have *not* been implemented are
RP> precisely those that would have made TB v2 radically different from TB
RP> as it was in 2000.
Hi R�mi,
why do you need a radically different mail agent? I'm very content that TB!
is continuously improved. ;o)
RP> I won't argue with you. You appear to be biased.
Maybe I'm biased too. But if I am it is because I like the development I
see with TB!. :o)
- --
Cheers
Peter
*********
This message was created using The Bat!, version 1.54 Beta/15,
under Windows 98, 4, 10, build 67766222,
on a Pentium II machine at 200MHz, 64 MB RAM :-)
.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32)
Comment: GnuPG for better authentication. Key-ID: 0xE10774CE
iD8DBQE8F7LRAzZSBuEHdM4RAvimAKDUdj4NjQ3WIF8pWsxwG2Uxm72zegCfTB7D
IrLdbiA5Mq4s/zSsFUENb8s=
=oplX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
