Hi Gerard, On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 09:05:13 +0200, you wrote: > JA> Each mail server tags on it's own details about how it received it, > JA> so even if TB! were not to set/update the In-Reply-To and Reference > JA> header, they'd easily be able to tell it didn't come from the > JA> original sender based on received headers anyway. > > I know all that, but it is not, lik you say, easy for most to see how > that works and to trace it back to the sender. What is easy to see is > something like <29839265925>@youre_url.com and see were it has been.
I realised that is what you meant... but even if TB! didn't tag those fields, and update the headers you are talking to, it is quite easy to see the mail didn't come from who it was supposed to have come from. > Anyway, one of the problems I have with MS software is that it tags > all sorts of personal info to your files and now I find that TB! does > this to :-( Actually that is technically incorrect. It puts a new mid, and your email so that the end user knows it got redirected. I don't see anywhere it putting in your address like MS Word does if you specify it in the configuration. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
