-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday, September 03, 2002, Peter Palmreuther wrote...

> ,-----= [ RFC-2822, Sec. 3.6.4 ] =-----
> | Though optional, every message SHOULD have a "Message-ID:" field.
> `-----=

I read SHOULD as required ;)  But that is me.  It makes spam tracking,
and abuse issues so much more easier to deal with when you have them
;)

JA>> so if one isn't put in by the mail client, the mail server is supposed
JA>> to do it.

> ACK. Because they're _strongly recommended_ most MTA do :-)

Understood.  The idea still stands I guess though, the mail client may
not put it in, but the server will (in 90% of the cases I guess).

- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt

iQA/AwUBPXTT3iuD6BT4/R9zEQJMOACgqYWiLqC4feK8BTueKvIl1zwR6SwAoJTm
YUys4W9bMgblNNMetd+NVB0K
=9QDX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to