Hello Gerard! On Tuesday, September 3, 2002 at 2:17:20 PM you wrote:
> 1) I have seen no documentation about this "feature" and I hate to see > my name appear in places I did not know about it before hand. Is it a feature? Or just the normal way? Wouldn't it be better to call the other method a feature, a kind of "Re-direct anonymously"? I'm not even sure if TB!'s way is more proper, and more according to at least the spirit of RFCs. > 2) Think about this scenario. I agree send you something and re-direct > it to make sure a 3th party can't see that it was me who supplied the > info. I would then be unpleasantly surprised if it could be traced back > so easily. OK, can't say anything against this, since I myself had one construct. But 1. Why should I do this? (Don't answer, I know the answer ... sadly.) 2. Wouldn't you just provide the answer with a short manual how to cut-and-paste? All in all I find the way TB! handles re-direct correct and right - technically and ethically. -- Dierk Haasis http://www.Write4U.de http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys The Bat 1.61 on Windows 95 4.0 1212 C A person who smiles in the face of adversity probably has a scapegoat. (Derek Leveret) ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
