Hello Mitch, Saturday, November 9, 2002, 9:25:35 PM, you wrote:
MW> Adam Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Saturday, November 9, 2002, 6:01:24 PM >> Saturday, November 9, 2002, 8:52:35 PM, rick wrote: >>> after 2 days it is working quite well. It uses probability instead of >>> static filters. Works wonderful so far. >> Are you just using it to filter spam? I was interested in replacing >> all my bat rules with this, but I don't know how well it would work. >> Given that my current filters get 90% of my spam anyway, I'm not sure >> it's worth it. MW> POPinfo doesn't replace your The Bat filters; it complements them. MW> POPinfo adds a special header to your e-mail to designate the type of MW> e-mail, you set up your filters to sort e-mail based on that header. POPFile eliminated over 100 of my spam filters. I think that is what the poster was wanting to know. MW> Of course, you don't need fancy-shmancy Bayesian statistical analysis MW> just to filter out mailing lists. And, as you say, there's existing MW> technology that already does a good job of filtering out spam. POPFile was not designed for filtering out mailing lists. It was designed for spam. -- Best regards, rick ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
