Hello Michael,

I downloaded SpamPal two days ago because of people on this list.  It
was very easy to setup and works awesome and invisible.  I put all my
spam in a spam trap folder, as suggested on the author's website.
Once a day, I go into the spam trap folder and add users to my
whitelist that got caught by accident.  I believe that in a couple of
weeks, everyone I want mail from will be on my white list.  Others, I
just delete for now.  When SpamPal is fully setup, I'll start
forwarding things to spamcop.

Michael

Friday, February 21, 2003, 1:46:46 PM, you wrote:



MG> Hi Thomas and list,

MG> On Friday, February 21, 2003 at 02:36:06 GMT +0700 (which was 20:36
MG> where I live) Thomas Fernandez wrote (at least in parts) and made
MG> these valuable points on the subject of "Plug-in/Feature Request to
MG> allow one to define a plugin to do something on a message or group of
MG> messages":

>> I haven't used spampal, but I see that it is not that easy to
>> configure, judging from the recent flushing of TBUDL by one Frank
>> Nijkamp. ;-)

MG> You can't hold spampal responsible for a wrong configuration.

MG> Apart from a terribly wrong configuration, I think it's quite stupid
MG> to send a reply to a spammer.

MG> I configured Spampal with a white list from my adressbook the first
MG> thing after installing (being carefull to have _all_ my mailing-lists in
MG> the whitelist), selecting some (!) DNSBL-Lists and after a weeks
MG> success with the bayesian-plugin.

MG> SpamPal works charmingly now for me. I empty my spamfolder once a ay
MG> to Spamcop <eg>.
 

-- 
Best regards,
 Michael                            
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Replied on 2/21/2003 at 2:43 PM using The Bat Ver 1.63 Beta/7

Attachments = <none>


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to