Hello Marck, On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:04:44 +0100 GMT (25/07/03, 00:04 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> Not by my logic. > .. which is clearly missing the point in this instance ;-). Well, let's see about that: TF>> Over here, they will stillbe sorted according to Received time TF>> or whatever I choose. I like that. > They will *never* be sorted in "order placed in folder". To find a > message in that way you would need to know exactly when it was > received. Which, over here, is equivalent. >>> This is especially useful when tracking down messages recently >>> moved to trash or the wrong folder... TF>> If I'm not completely off, you will find them there according to TF>> the Received time. > Erm .. only if you happen to know it when you moved the wrong > message to the wrong folder or deleted one you didn't mean to. Sure, > I've found messages I deleted mistakenly, but it's taken me more > time than it could have done if the "unsorted" viewing order were an > option. I'm starting to get your point: you move a message today that you received a month ago. Then you cannot find it any more, because it is sorted according to Received time. You want this to be the last in the folder, because it was "received by this folder" as the last message. As I handle my mails as soon as they come in, I didn't think about that and therefore indeed missed your point. I'll go and hide under a suitable stone now, if that's OK with you. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. Neulich ist ein Statistiker gestorben. Er hinterlaesst eine Frau und zweieinhalb Kinder. Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/5 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A using a Pentium P4 1.7 GHz, 128MB RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
