-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Allie,
Thursday, October 16, 2003, 6:17:34 AM, you wrote: AM> John Morse, [JM] wrote: JM>> PGP is an absolute waste of time (to me) AM> TB! has always provided good support for PGP in the interest of AM> secure e-mailing as a primary part of its development path. For AM> professional and even private e-mailing, I strongly agree with and AM> endorse this, so discussing this would certainly be on-topic, IMO. TB!'s support for PGP is in fact one of the reasons I switched to it (from Eudora). AM> How do you prove to others that e-mail is in fact from you or that AM> e-mail you sent hasn't been altered after you signed it? I currently work overseas (Former Soviet Union),where the hackers and virus writers are legion (and quite proficient). I started to use PGP because of several incidents when people received e-mail purportedly from me. Explaining that I was not in the country, and therefore had no e-mail access at the time, did no good. I therefore started using PGP so that people could verify whether I'd in fact sent the message in question. Not many people used PGP, meaning they could not verify my signature, but at least it was there. At the time, I had frequent problems getting valid signatures with Eudora. As a result, I started looking around and found TB!. While I switched initially because I wanted (and needed) better PGP support, I've since found that it's also a much better program overall. - -- Richard H. Stoddard PGP Request: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt Comment: KeyID: 0x899FEAAB Comment: Fingerprint: 0F58 92FF 24DC B847 9A85 6ED4 9EAF FD46 899F EAAB iQA/AwUBP42x7J6v/UaJn+qrEQJRhQCg8aZoIGhaL9vpSLxa9PwGXwfcGP0AoKfY +mjER/nKcsvguhH9ej04vtN/ =R/fK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
