< ... heavily edited for brevity's sake ... > S> Sorry, Microsoft client users do irritate me entirely ;-D And I am S> certain that they are all out to get at me, personally ;-) S> ... If ever I mentioned Netiquette and standards S> ... sometimes they'd get all bolshy and insist it was S> their right to compose mail 'any bloody way they wanted to'. S> RFC288 says [line wrap] MUST be less S> than 78 characters and Netiquette between 70 and 76. Anything less S> than 78 characters is acceptable then. S> ... properly formatted messages would be nice, yes.
rg>> let our email clients wrap text so it fits on the screen. S> I totally disagree. To me that is an ugly and 'hard' way of presenting S> information for reading. S> Nothing to fix IMO With nothing to fix then you are doomed to read crummy, poorly formatted emails. Even If I found a way to both A) send messages you found easy on the eyes & B) use the editor that I prefer there would still be millions of other folks sending you email inconsiderately formatted. I'm sure we all know this is in the end like arguing religion. We may end up actually getting emotional about it even thought there's nothing we can do to convert everybody else to do what's "right". -- Rich ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
