Thomas Fernandez wrote: > On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:19:57 +0100 GMT (23/11/2003, 02:19 +0700 GMT), > Mark Partous wrote:
>> Resulting in something like the above? >> Is this allowed? > Why should it not be allowed? Assuming Mark was referring to his User-Agent header, which was: >> User-Agent: Ritlabs' De Vleermuis 2.01.26 Business Edition Carsten mentioned in the root of this thread: ,----- [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] | A correct (conform with RFCs) User-Agent header looks like mine ;-) | i. e. User-Agent: Software/Version (Comment) `----- I'm having a hard time finding an RFC that covers this. The best I've come up with is a draft RFC for News articles: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-usefor-article-11.txt The definition of the User-Agent field (section 6.18) seems to exclude the use of whitespace (among other things, including double-quotes) within a product name and would have the product version follow a "/". The atoms are defined in Appendix B.1. Anyone know of a more authoritative source for the proper use of the User-Agent header in mail or news? -- George Using TB! 2.01.49 on Windows XP Pro 5.1, Build 2600, Service Pack 1. ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
