Hi 9Val --------------------------------------------- On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, at 23:01:23 [GMT +0300] (which was 1:01 PM where I live) you wrote: <snip>
> Well, at home I'm working with IMAP at 21.6Kbit dial-up. So speed is a > really *big* issue for me. And I prefer to use TB! without any > synchronization - I just walk through folders and TB! loads only UIDS > and Flags (downloading headers for last 1000 mails from TBBETA is > quite slowly on clients which load full headers) . After selecting > folder I'm walking through unread messages and only they are loaded - > no overhead. So... > May be Thunderbird is faster on wide connections, don't know and have > no possibility to test Yea, I'm sure that with little overhead TB is very quick indeed. I am only trying to compare Outlook and TB with like settings. TB is markedly slower (that is not a complaint...only an observation) -- Best Regards, Kevin Using The Bat! v2.12 Beta/7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
pgpD398xNP0jy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.11.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
