Hello Mica Mijatovic & everyone else, on 03-Apr-2005 at 00:19 you (Mica Mijatovic) wrote:
> I see you haven't read my passage about *the* free software I refer to, > *yet*, starting with "And just a" and ending with "I do that". I read that, but how could I know about your views after reading your first message? Nevertheless, I replied to the parts of your message that were relevant to me. Not because I'm hasty or I didn't understand you, but to make my point clearer (I often find myself wrestling with the english words to express what I really mean, I'm not a native speaker). You know that people tend to defend their software, point of view, whatever, even when it was - hmmm - "proven" wrong, thats why I thought you were probably angry, since I said AntiVir is useless. This perhaps leads to a meta discussion about the different types and motivations of free software, and it was not my intention to lead the discussion into that direction. My intention was only to state a bold "be aware" when talking about free-of-cost antivirus programs. since in that context, I found no free software that serves the purpose well enough; and another "be aware" seeing how easily people recommend this or that program, just because they like it - and this personal liking often goes beyond functionality and/or reason. Hope you had a nice ride. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) Things always seem darkest just before the bottom drops out. -- Arthur Lifshin ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
