Hello Allister Jenks & everyone else, on 03-Apr-2005 at 03:29 you (Allister Jenks) wrote:
> I think there is also considerable "risk" in placing any weight behind > "payware" being of better quality because you have to pay for it. I never meant to say that. > I realise you said the first two factors do not include cost, but > subsequent statements have been negatory on the "free" bit. I am using a lot of free software. I just don't divide them into categories (like, whether its free because the vendor wants to advertise a full version this way, or if its done out of enthusiasm by individuals to serve the purpose that a free software that does this and that should exist). If a software does its job good for me, I use it (and pay for it), its that simple. :-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981) In the society of men the truth resides now less in what things are than in what they are not. -- R. D. Laing ________________________________________________ Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
