On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Emmanuel Lochin <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 4 November 2011 14:00, Pars Mutaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > General answer to this Steve's approach: > > > > Please let's compare it with the money we spend for 100s of conferences. > > Hi Pars, > > I'm quite confused ... the problem is a question of pace of review or > a question of conference cost? Because taking into account only the > cost related to the subscription of a conference is too simplistic. > You miss the impact of conferences for local researchers that have > difficulties to travel and the overall obvious impact on the economy > for some countries. > Hi Emmanuel, I don't understand. We say nothing against conferences although they are obviously too expensive. Pars > Regards > > Emmanuel > > > (BTW dear chair the goal was to open a new discussion, but discuss it if > > you wish of course) > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Pars Mutaf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Bush, Stephen F (GE Global Research) < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> I haven't been following the thread on this one, but just from reading > the > >>> petition, IMHO, it comes off sounding like spoiled children who want > lots > >>> of > >>> free things. > >>> > >>> > >> non-sense. > >> > >> > >> > >>> If this is really necessary, time would be better spent developing a > >>> business > >>> plan to make it successful, or at least somewhat attractive to a > business > >>> or > >>> agency, not just demanding a list of free things. > >>> > >>> > >> Do it please. We are also working on it. The goal of the petition is to > >> support the idea so that it is adopted. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Steve > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: [email protected] > >>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pars Mutaf > >>> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 3:06 AM > >>> To: TCCC > >>> Subject: [Tccc] Online scientific social networking (Updated the old > >>> petition: > >>> Replacing scientific conferences with a cheap and efficient on-line > open > >>> system) > >>> > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> Based on your input and many discussions on different mailing lists we > >>> have > >>> updated the petition "Replacing scientific conferences with a cheap and > >>> efficient on-line open system." > >>> > >>> The following new petition expresses much better our (signers) argument > >>> and > >>> the solution that we want: > >>> > >>> > >>> > http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/we-want-online-scientific-social-networking.html > >>> > >>> SO PLEASE MAKE ONE MORE EFFORT: Sign it and share it with ALL your > >>> colleagues. > >>> > >>> Pars > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications > >>> (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications > > (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. > > [email protected] > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc > > > > > > -- > "This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain legally > privileged information or copyright material. You should not read, copy, > use > or disclose them without authorisation. If you are not an intended > recipient, please contact us at once by return email and then delete both > messages. We do not accept liability in connection with computer virus, > data corruption, delay, interruption, unauthorised access or unauthorised > amendment. This notice should not be removed" > _______________________________________________ IEEE Communications Society Tech. Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) - for discussions on computer networking and communication. [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/tccc
