* Ken Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020328 20:29]: > Second, they are making us pay for something we don't want, or use, and > that it is more costly than it's worth and can be done more economically.
Are you referring to LRT, or any alternative-mode-of-transport that isn't a car or a bus? > alleviate traffic and people shouldn't have to use alternative transit just > because the people in power won't use our tax dollars the way we want them > to. I dont think any orginization is entering into stuff like the Northstar project without ample research pointing to a real viability and benefit. I would be interested if you can cite specific examples where: A) a proposal forces people to use their form of transport that does not come from the 'they are taking our road money' line of thought. B) a proposal that doesn't have some sort of current parallel with a specific amount of mass transit users in a overloaded condition at some time during the day. (To the point where an articulated bus doesn't meet demand) -- Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.ringworld.org/ Coon Rapids _______________________________________________ Twin Cities Metropolitan Issues Forum http://www.e-democracy.org/tcmetro Rules: Sign posts with real name. You may not post more than twice a day.
