On Nov 29, 2006, at 4:40 PM, James Barrow wrote: > I agree with the evolution of the threads. And throughout this > evolution > lots of concrete information (websites, articles, reference material, > etc.) > is included. What I see is this concrete information picked from the > threads and included in the wiki. > > The thread does not get moved. The threads and the wiki run > concurrently, > but independently. > > And no, no blog. No. Nada. Please, no blog. >
A blog is a great place for an individual to express views. It really can't do the same thing as a wiki or an email list. I shudder to think of anyone trying to make it do that. With that said, I don't see anything inherently wrong with TCP having it's own official blog. It might be a good way to throw out ideas, talk about site or list mechanics, and those kinds of topics. The topics, the focus, and the nature of the medium would separate it from the list or the wiki. Tarage ______________________________________________ Are you a Help Authoring Trainer or Consultant? Let clients find you at www.HAT.Matrix.com, the searchable HAT database based on Char James-Tanny's HAT Comparison Matrix. Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for details. Interested in Interactive 3D Documentation? Get the scoop at http://www.doc-u-motion.com -- your 3D documentation community. _______________________________________________ Technical Communication Professionals Post a message to the list: email [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, unsubscribe, archives, account options, list info: http://techcommpros.com/mailman/listinfo/tcp_techcommpros.com Subscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Need help? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Get the TCP whole experience! http://www.techcommpros.com
