John,

To set the record straight, I pulled out of the second convention as
coordinator in a meeting full of other people and with a clear path as to
who would take over...the person who was already attempting to take over
anyway...and I just let him.

Reason - because I was the Acting President...because the President, a very
good friend of mine, was dying of a brain cancer and had given me his
blessing to resign in light of the abuse I was taking. He'd asked me to take
over...I took over, got abused right and left...and decided that when
volunteering isn't fun...and all you get is abuse...it ain't worth it. I
also envisioned myself standing up at the convention and thanking this
wonderful man for his years of service to the community...knowing he would
either be dead before the convention (and I'd have to thank him past tense),
or close to dying. I wasn't even sure which was harder, but I knew, having
lost a cousin and both my father-in-law and my mother-in-law to brain
cancer, that I just couldn't do it.

The accusation that everything is my ego if I don't agree is wrong. I
actually didn't have an ego, but my sense of self-preservation finally
kicked in. As an example, the person who succeeded me (even before I
formally left), insisted I give him my contacts with Macromedia or eHelp
(don't remember which) at the time. I asked him on what basis he thought I
owed STC those contacts. He mumbled something about them being STC contacts
and I said, listen, I've been a recognized RoboHelp expert for years. I GOT
MY OWN CONTACTS. I worked with them, built it up etc. The fact that I TRIED
to use my contacts to help STC does NOT mean they are STC contacts. The
Admin Council agreed.

I handed over EVERYTHING else...I did NOT leave them in the lurch or abandon
them. And, by the way, it was my SECOND convention I was coordinating for
them - I did the first one of its scale EVER held in Israel...and the idea
was largely my own. I was the driving force and it became a running joke for
weeks at each meeting when others thought it would fail...that I said it
wouldn't. The first was an amazing success. The second...much less so
because they ran it poorly on the day of the event (I paid to attend the
first convention - even as convention coordinator and, having paid, I didn't
attend a single session because I was running the whole time making sure it
ran like clock work). 

I ran another conference this past January - NOT STC...and it was an amazing
success as well and again, I didn't get to attend a single full session.

John, be careful when you accuse someone of mixing their ego into things or
laying down rules that say a definitive reason for something. The reality
here is that STC has managed to turn off almost every long term volunteer it
has ever had here.

Another example - the membership here was FURIOUS that the president (before
my friend) used STC money to travel twice to Europe. They voted, clearly,
that NO funds were to be used for that again. My friend honored that
request, as did I, as did the person who followed me (who was on the Audit
Committee against the initial guy who did it). No sooner did that person
stop being president...than the next president up and did it again (with the
approval of the Admin Council, not the membership). When I brought it to the
attention of the members, I was called a liar. The truth was there in the
receipts. 

When I state what I did in the past for STC, I do so because I don't believe
the ONLY way to criticize is from within and I do believe that 10+ years of
membership DOES leave me and others the right to criticize. I started the
discussion about the tiered system and its faults. And the answer was - we
can't change it now even though we admit is isn't fair - but pay again this
year and hopefully we'll change it next year. No, that isn't right. When you
admit something is wrong...you stop and figure out how to fix it, not
compound it. Or...at least retroactively fix it. That wasn't done.

The fact that I was right wasn't the point. The fact that the system was
WRONG and needed to be changed WAS the point. But the attitudes involved
(like the attitude you show here and other STC leaders showed during that
discussion...except for Mark in England and Char and a few others) convinced
me that I could do more outside STC than in, that the usefulness of STC had
passed for me as a professional in the field. When THAT changes for me, I'll
consider rejoining...and NOT so I can put more money into an organization so
that others think I have the right to criticize it.

Paula 


Paula R. Stern
WritePoint Ltd.
www.writepoint.com

-----Original Message-----
From: John Posada [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 4:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Gordon McLean'; 'Suzette Leeming'; 'TCP List'
Subject: RE: [TCP] OT Vent re: STC

> I was a member for more than 10 years - while I was a member, I

I'm aware

> complained about the pricing structure and was treated, for the most 
> part, like garbage for daring to raise the issue.
> When it was finally corrected, the local Admin Council acted as if 
> they alone had thought of the problem and solved it.

So you are upset not about STC and how they handled tiered membership, but
because they bruised your ego.

> I was the first convention coordinator. In the middle of organizing 
> the convention coordinator, I decided to pull out for a variety of 
> reasons...I attended the second convention - again, not a word of 
> appreciation for the efforts I'd put in.

So, you pulled out in the middle of a committment, probably left them
scrambling to find a replacement, and you wanted to be recognized for your
effort?

> I was Acting President and tried to get STC national to recognize and 
> do things in Israel to justify the tremendous amount of money they 
> were taking from our membership - nothing.

Maybe they didn't agree with your position. That happens.

> The complaint - you don't have a say unless you are a member doesn't 
> work -

Yeah...it does. You don't agree with it, but others do

> because I was a member and had complaints and they were ignored 
> consistently for 10 years. I gave STC enough of my money and my

It's not a bank. You don't deposit time for withdrawl as complaints later
after you leave. You get involved, you push for change. You withdraw, you
watch from the sidelines


I could go back and forth on the rest of the issues, but I think you aren't
going to agree with my logic. Therefore, I'll just say that I maintain my
position.

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

"They say everyone needs goals. Mine is to live forever.
So far, so good."


--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.28/1123 - Release Date: 11/10/2007
3:47 PM



______________________________________________

Author Help files and create printed documentation with Doc-To-Help.
New release adds Team Authoring Support, enhanced Web-based help
technology and PDF output. Learn more at www.doctohelp.com/tcp.


Interactive 3D Documentation
Parts catalogs, animated instructions, and more. www.i3deverywhere.com
_______________________________________________

Technical Communication Professionals

Post a message to the list: email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe, unsubscribe, archives, account options, list info: 
http://techcommpros.com/mailman/listinfo/tcp_techcommpros.com
Subscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe (email): send a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Need help? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Get the TCP whole experience! http://www.techcommpros.com

Reply via email to