By all means. Stand on process over correctness. Joe
> On Aug 3, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Joe, > >> On 04/08/14 00:48, Joe Touch wrote: >> >> >>> On Aug 3, 2014, at 4:25 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Joe, >>> >>>> On 03/08/14 16:42, Joe Touch wrote: >>>> >>>> We can either discuss these issues or continue to ignore them. >>> >>> Please either provide evidence that "these issues" were ignored >>> during the charter discussion, >> >> The contradiction speaks for itself. > > Frankly I don't think that's at all sufficient, nor > even remotely compelling. A pointer to where you or > someone raised this point when the charter was in > play on this list or the IETF list might help. Absent > that, or even with that and no apparent support that > its a real issue, my conclusion is that you are just > second guessing the IETF consensus process and therefore > ought be ignored on this point. > > S. > >> >> Joe >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tcpinc mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc >> >> _______________________________________________ Tcpinc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
