On 8/4/2014 2:14 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Joe Touch wrote this message on Sun, Aug 03, 2014 at 22:36 -0700:
I thought I understood the goals of the charter but the points
raised by others leads me to conclude none of us does and that the
charter is mostly a hammer in search of a nail justified by a
meaningless BCP.
I still believe tcp-AO-enc has its utility against connection
attacks, but I don't see how any current proposal can address
antitracking via unauthenticated means.
I don't see antitracking in the charter... Maybe I'm missing something?
"Pervasive monitoring" is the term from the BCP. Replace antitrack above
with that term.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Tcpinc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpinc
