Generally: Thanks for all the feedback in this thread. Appreciated! On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 14:50 -0400, Kristen Lans wrote: > Overall seems fine to me, especially given that this is an > experiment. As with all experiments, I wonder: how will you know you > are successful? I see things like "All open changesets submitted by > *new* volunteers (as opposed to new changesets alone) in the last > three months should have at least one review.".
For the specific example, data in Korma might be helpful to evaluate: http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/code_contrib_new_gone.html (However it's unclear to me how often that is updated; also see https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T102112 marked as a blocker) > Probably be good to be really clear and explicit about what success > looks like for this event in order to evaluate whether or not it will > be an ongoing thing. +1 on "we need metrics for evaluation of success" That's an area I still need to do more homework. andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
