On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 16:58 -0700, Arthur Richards wrote: > Couple of questions - are there plans to document/track > 'unmaintained' repositories?
That sounds pretty related to the discussion in https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T102920 (input welcome!). AFAIK we don't even have a general "consensus" how to define "unmaintained". :-/ Are you basically after automatically updated stats that state "Repository XYZ saw the last merged code change on YYYY-MM-DD" (and hopefully exclude merged translation updates)? Only thing I know is: We do have some activity charts per repo at http://korma.wmflabs.org/browser/scm-repos.html but I have no idea what that list is sorted by or if it is sortable. Feel free to file a request under "Analytics-Tech-community-metrics" in Phabricator. > Further, are there additional metrics that can come out of the GCD > that we don't get out of Korma that would be useful information to > have (eg patches to non-WMF maintained repos vs patches to WMF > maintained repos)? I'm not aware of any (machine-readable?) "repositories maintained by WMF folks" information available anywhere. I am/was only aware of files which list the (MW extension) repos deployed on WMF servers. Those were once upon a time listed in https://git.wikimedia.org/raw/mediawiki%2ftools%2frelease.git/HEAD/make-wmf-branch%2fdefault.conf and now that I check I see they are not anymore. Hmm hmm. andre -- Andre Klapper | Wikimedia Bugwrangler http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper/ _______________________________________________ teampractices mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/teampractices
