Yves Dorfsman <[email protected]> writes: > Richard Chycoski wrote: > > > > AD is solid, scalable, and well supported. There *are* some gotchas if > > you are looking for 100% LDAP compatibility, but for authc/authz (login, > > groups, etc.) nothing else performs quite as well. (I do hope that Open > > LDAP catches up!) > > What is the advantage of going ldap against AD vs. using kerberos ?
OpenLDAP/kerberos works swimmingly on Linux and Mac, and has cheap failover options; I've not gotten a non-AD LDAP/kerberos type system working to auth windows clients, so I guess the advantage of AD is that you can use it on windows clients as well as Linux clients. _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
