Luke S Crawford wrote: >>> AD is solid, scalable, and well supported. There *are* some gotchas if >>> you are looking for 100% LDAP compatibility, but for authc/authz (login, >>> groups, etc.) nothing else performs quite as well. (I do hope that Open >>> LDAP catches up!) >> What is the advantage of going ldap against AD vs. using kerberos ? > > OpenLDAP/kerberos works swimmingly on Linux and Mac, and has > cheap failover options; I've not gotten a non-AD LDAP/kerberos > type system working to auth windows clients, so I guess the advantage > of AD is that you can use it on windows clients as well as Linux > clients. >
Sorry, should have been clearer, I meant: LDAP on UNIX against AD vs. Kerberos on UNIX against AD -- Yves. http://www.sollers.ca/ _______________________________________________ Tech mailing list [email protected] http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
