On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:47:50PM -0700, russell wrote: > Owain Ainsworth wrote: > >On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 01:35:53PM -0700, russell wrote: > >>Well it compiled, and runs, dmesg + Xorg.log follows. only Thing I > >>"Think" i noticed is a sort of slower screen update, when updating > >>large parts of the screen I get this crawl of updating segments down > >>screen. > >> > >>regarding the kernel: GENERIC kernel with ath patches(poking around, > >>trying to get my radio working) > >> > >>(EE) intel(0): [drm] Failed to detect GEM. Kernel 2.6.28 required. > > > >You did not read the message that introduced this driver. It said that > >you must have "option INTELDRM_GEM" in your kernel config. If you get > >that message, then you did not do this. > > > >-0- > > Well I feel stupid, sorry about that, I grabbed the wrong log file. > because yeah the first time I added "option INTEMDRM_GEM" I was writing > a detailed message on what I did, why it did not work etc... at > which point I found my typo, corrected it, and everything ran just > as it should. I then proceeded to include the first nonworking > Xorg.log *sigh*.
Heh, happens to everyone sooner or later. > > well if it is worth anything to you here is the correct Xorg.log > I was unable verify that it was in fact using the GEM driver interface > I assume it is as that is the code I put in and X failed to start > when I had the wrong option line in the kernel config. Yes, that looks much better. So it is mostly ok? -0- -- "Here at the Phone Company, we serve all kinds of people; from Presidents and Kings to the scum of the earth ..."
