On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:12:52PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > This is a little meta, but if we're going to start pulling changes from > bitrig, I don't think "commit 171e1f9d" is the attribution style we > should use.
It seems that that the branch I took these from is rebased and thus the commit ids are now incorrect. So if a commit id is referenced it should be referenced in a branch that doesn't get rebased (probably master in this case). -- Arto Jonsson
