> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 03:12:52PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > > This is a little meta, but if we're going to start pulling changes from > > bitrig, I don't think "commit 171e1f9d" is the attribution style we > > should use. > > It seems that that the branch I took these from is rebased and thus the > commit ids are now incorrect. So if a commit id is referenced it should > be referenced in a branch that doesn't get rebased (probably master in > this case).
Like, who cares about about commit id's. Projects are just people working together. A project didn't come up with that diff. A person did. When we say where something came from, we do it by giving credit, not by referencing some thing which will go away.
