Kenneth Westerback [kwesterb...@gmail.com] wrote: > > Why is the burden on everyone to provide 'valid' objections? Should > not the burden be on you to at least hint at a point to this change? > Given the miniscule IPv6 usage out there, why should IPv6 come first? >
I like how IPv6 support turns primary and secondary DNS caches from a redundancy feature for clients to dual points of failure (for some resolver implementations.) No response from either server for the first AF you try? Just wait for a full time out before you try the second AF!
